← Back to ResearchGEVI Research Series · PITAA Countries · Paper 6

Solomon IslandsCounted Work, Hidden Earnings

High participation coexists with vulnerable work and limited formal wage employment.

49.8GEVI / 100 · Hidden band

Solomon Islands scores a GEVI of 49.8 (90% interval 45.3 to 53.9), in the Hidden band. Almost as many women as men are in the labour force (82.3% against 86.2%), but 79.1% of employed women are in vulnerable work and only 20.4% hold wage jobs, so participation does not translate into visible, formal earnings. No input is imputed, although three (NEET, management share and firm ownership) date from 2013 to 2015 and are graded B.

WORK VERSUS FORMAL EARNINGS100-DOT PANELS
Solomon Islands dot matrix of women’s workFemale labour force participation is 82.3%. Among employed women, vulnerable employment is 79.1% and wage employment is 20.4%. These measures have different denominators.SOLOMON ISLANDS · WORK & EARNINGSWomen’s outcomes on a 100-dot scaleIn the labour force82.3%In vulnerable employment79.1%In wage / salaried work20.4%Dots rounded. Employment measures use employed women;labour participation uses the female working-age population.
FEMALE LABOUR PARTICIPATION: 82.3%
GEVI score49.8
Rank8 / 15
Blind-spot ratio0.00

Source: the attached country paper. Animation reveals the reported measures; it does not show change over time.

01

Abstract

Solomon Islands scores a GEVI of 49.8 (90% interval 45.3 to 53.9), in the Hidden band. Almost as many women as men are in the labour force (82.3% against 86.2%), but 79.1% of employed women are in vulnerable work and only 20.4% hold wage jobs, so participation does not translate into visible, formal earnings. No input is imputed, although three (NEET, management share and firm ownership) date from 2013 to 2015 and are graded B.

The headline participation rate hides the real gap. D1 is 0.766 because so many women work, but D2 (job quality) is only 0.512: women are 20 points more likely than men to be in vulnerable employment and wage work reaches half as many women as men (20.4% against 39.0%). Enforcement is also the lowest of any measured economy: experts rate women's legal rights as enforced at 21% of their potential.

The paper prioritises measure informal women's income; refresh the 2013 to 2015 inputs; link enforcement data to justice statistics.

Solomon Islands shows why the index needs more than participation: a 82.3% female labour force participation rate coexists with wage work reaching only a fifth of women, so the data use is to expose the gap between counted and formal work.

Download the paper PDF
02

Headline result

High participation coexists with vulnerable work and limited formal wage employment.

49.8/100
Hidden band

90% interval 45.3–53.9.
Rank 8 of 15 · Blind-spot ratio 0.00.

0.250D4 Institutional visibility
versus D1 at 0.766

Solomon Islands shows why the index needs more than participation: a 82.3% female labour force participation rate coexists with wage work reaching only a fifth of women, so the data use is to expose the gap between counted and formal work.

03

How the index is built

Each dimension is the simple mean of its indicators. GEVI is the weighted geometric mean of the five dimension scores.

Dimension scores and aggregation trace
DimensionScore DWeight wD^w
D1 Labour participation0.7660.250.9355
D2 Job quality and seniority0.5120.200.8746
D3 Enterprise and legal rights0.5410.200.8844
D4 Institutional visibility0.2500.150.8123
D5 Statistical and political voice0.4350.200.8466
GEVI = 100 × 0.7660.25 × 0.5120.20 × 0.5410.20 × 0.2500.15 × 0.4350.20
= 49.8

Product of the five terms = 0.4976, so GEVI = 100 × 0.4976 = 49.8, rank 8 of 15. Dimension values and the index are rounded as reported in the source.

Uncertainty and rank sensitivity

The 10,000-draw simulation samples each score with the standard deviation of its grade (10 grade A at 0.02, 3 grade B at 0.06) and draws dimension weights from a Dirichlet distribution centred on the base weights. Median 49.6, 5th to 95th percentile 45.3 to 53.9; blind-spot ratio 0/13 = 0.00. Under 5,000 random weight sets alone, the rank has a median of 9 with a range of 6 to 12.

04

Where the gap is

Each dimension is raised to full parity while holding the others fixed.

Gain from lifting each dimension to full parity
Dimension raised to 1.0GEVIGain
D153.2+3.4
D256.9+7.1
D356.3+6.5
D461.3+11.5
D558.8+9.0

Single-indicator scenarios

Each scenario lifts one indicator to the upper quartile of countries with data.

Single-indicator upper quartile scenarios
Indicator liftedFromToGEVIGain
I4 Non-vulnerable employment0.5100.98952.5+2.8
I12 Women MPs0.1200.38252.4+2.7
I6 Wage and salaried employment0.5230.98452.4+2.7
I11 Women ministers0.1900.37352.1+2.4

Values and gains are reproduced as printed in the paper; rounding can cause differences between displayed gains and subtraction of displayed index values. These conditional scenarios are not forecasts or causal estimates.

Reading the result

The headline participation rate hides the real gap. D1 is 0.766 because so many women work, but D2 (job quality) is only 0.512: women are 20 points more likely than men to be in vulnerable employment and wage work reaches half as many women as men (20.4% against 39.0%). Enforcement is also the lowest of any measured economy: experts rate women's legal rights as enforced at 21% of their potential.

Raising the wage employment parity score (I6) from 0.523 to 0.75 would add 1.4 points, and the same change to non-vulnerable employment (I4) would add 1.5, so the formal-work gap is worth about 3 points if closed together.

05

Priorities and practical use

The priorities connect the index to actions and named users.

01

Measure informal women's income. A survey module or administrative match that records the value and sex of informal and market-selling income would turn a very large invisible workforce into data and address the D2 weakness directly.

02

Refresh the 2013 to 2015 inputs. Three inputs are graded B; a new enterprise and household round would tighten the interval.

03

Link enforcement data to justice statistics. The 21% enforcement score is an expert perception; case-tracking would show where the perception gap comes from.

Who uses the data, and for what decision?

Data products, users, decisions and cadence
Data productPrimary userDecision it informsCadence
I4 and I6: vulnerable employment (79.1% of women) and wage work (20.4%) by sexLabour ministry, revenue authority, central bankHow large the invisible informal female workforce is, and whether a simplified small-trader tax or payment scheme would bring it into viewAnnual
Market-selling income by sex (a new survey module)Statistics office, finance ministryReplace an inference about informal earnings with a measure; this is the direct fix for the D2 weaknessHousehold survey round
I9 enforcement (21%) linked to justice-sector case dataJustice ministry, police, courtsWhere the enforcement gap arises (reporting, prosecution or sentencing)Annual
I2, I5 and I7 refreshed (2013 to 2015 values)Statistics officeMove three grade B inputs to grade A and tighten the intervalNext household and enterprise round

Solomon Islands shows why the index needs more than participation: a 82.3% female labour force participation rate coexists with wage work reaching only a fifth of women, so the data use is to expose the gap between counted and formal work.

Source and scope. This summary reproduces the attached paper’s reported findings, scores and scenarios. The uncertainty interval and weight sensitivity qualify the headline result. The blind-spot ratio identifies imputed index inputs; measured inputs may still be dated. I13 covers 9 of 12 data rows.

Series: GEVI Research Series · DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23206104